Home About Topplebush.com Contact Us Links
Topple Bush Store Articles about George Bush Bush Resume Bush Humor Contribute
Sound Off
Support
Topplebush.com!

Bush coin button
Please also visit our own Store to find lots of interesting, unusual, and funny politically-themed products

Topplebush Books
Find all the progressive books featured on our site plus DVDs, and CDs.


Support our web site using PayPal!
Contact Elected Officials

- Write to Congress
- Write to Congress by State
- Write to Senate by state
- White House switchboard: 1-202-224-3121
- Capitol tollfree: 1-888-355-3588
- Complete White House telephone directory

Bush bashing books with humor

View Cart/Checkout

Scalia extols free speech -- and betrays it
by Leonard Pitt
Miami Herald
April 16, 2004

I'm sorry, but I still want my pound of flesh.

Granted, apologies have been given and promises made. Still, the transgression was so profound, so antithetical to the letter and spirit of the Constitution, that it's hard to let it go at that.

For those who missed it: Last week, Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia went to Hattiesburg, Miss., to speak at Presbyterian Christian High. Scalia typically does not allow video or audio recordings to be made of his speeches, but no such prohibition was announced at this particular appearance, which was open to the public. Two reporters covering the event recorded the speech in order to quote it accurately in their stories. Web Vote Do you agree with Leonard Pitts Jr. that the recent Scalia incident indicates an erosion of civil liberties? Yes -- Government officials seizing reporters' tapes does not bode well. No -- This was an isolated incident and Scalia has even apologized.

Afterward, both were confronted by a deputy of the United States Marshals Service, which provides security for Supreme Court justices.

The deputy seized a digital recorder from Denise Grones of The Associated Press and erased its contents. She also confiscated a cassette tape from Antoinette Konz of the Hattiesburg American and later returned it, erased.

Now me, I have a tendency to go overboard when things like this happen. I start raving about jackboots and making unflattering comparisons to North Korea and other bastions of freedom.

So instead of subjecting you to me ranting, "Oh, my God. That boggles the mind," I decided to seek a sober, reasoned response from an expert. I turned to Robert Beatty, an authority on the First Amendment who is vice president and general counsel for this very newspaper.

A LETTER OF APOLOGY

"Oh, my God," he said. "That boggles the mind."

Donald Jones, a professor of constitutional law at the University of Miami, agreed. He called it "outrageous."

"If the First Amendment means anything," said Jones, "[It means] the public has a right to know. The right to information is a key right, along with the right to express one's ideas. Our ability to function as citizens, our ability to vote intelligently, everything depends on the free flow of information."

"It is chilling of the First Amendment," Beatty said. "It is chilling of the need of news gatherers to gather the news."

And it is galling, too, given that we're talking about a Supreme Court justice whose speech -- hello? -- reportedly extolled the virtues of the Constitution. Can you spell irony, boys and girls?

As noted, Scalia has written a letter of apology to the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, which had criticized the seizure. While promising to allow future speeches to be recorded, he also said, "The action was not taken at my direction."

The justice's claim of blamelessness is undermined, if not flat contradicted, by Nehemiah Flowers, the U.S. marshal in Jackson, Miss., who told The New York Times, "This is a justice of the Supreme Court and as far as we're concerned, we're following the court's orders."

BASED ON STANDING POLICY

A spokeswoman for the Marshals Service in Washington added that the confiscation was "based on the justice's standing policy."

You might write it off as an isolated example of a judge's bad judgment, except that there is a context here, isn't there? It's a context that finds the government's powers of surveillance expanded, Americans of Arab heritage detained indefinitely without access to counsel, John Ashcroft legally empowered to poke into our reading habits.

Now there's this: government officials seizing what amounts to a reporter's notes. There can be few things more intimidating or less likely to instill confidence in government's respect for constitutional guarantees. This is, to the contrary, a troubling reminder that there is nothing foreordained about civil liberties, and that the rights we take for granted can be eroded, snatched away.

These are ominous times for freedom. You might want to speak out while you still can.

Topplebush.com
Posted: April 18, 2004

Archives


Main Sections:
/ Home / About Us / Contact Us / Links / Topple Bush Store / Bush Articles / Bush Resume / Bush Humor / Contribute /

Topple Bush Submenus:
Topplebush Store: / T-shirts / Bush Coins / Bumper Stickers / Peace Magz / Obama08 / Blow-out clearance sale / T-shirt sale / Bumper Sticker sale / Bush Legacy Gear /
Bush Articles: / Past Business Dealings / Military Record / Family History / Record as Governor of TX / Stealing the Florida Election / George G. W. Bush / Record as President / Dick Cheney /
Bush Humor: / Jokes / Cartoons / Photos 1 / Photos 2 / Photos 3 / Animation / Other / Trump Jokes / Trump Limericks /
Contribute: / Candidates / Topple Bush Site /

Other Sections:
/ Books / DVDs / CDs / MP3 Music for Free Download / Free flyers to Print Out & Distribute / Election Fraud Information /

Fun Topplebush Projects:
/ Remove Condi Rice from the Football Playoff Committee /
Find New Slogan for Fox News / Send Pills to Rush / Find a New Slogan for the GOP / Create Better Language for Dems and Progressives / Blame Reagan / What military recruiters say to fill their quotas / Photo Caption Contest - Win a Free Prize! /

Share this web page with like-minded people:
/ digg / reddit / del.icio.us / stumbleupon / google web history /